Training & Development.


Training & development is the process of ensuring that the organization has the knowledgeable, skilled and engaged work force it needs. It involving the organization facilitating their employees with training, guiding, learning programs & coaching & self-directed learning activities carried out by employers them self (George W Bohlander Scott A.Snell, 2015).

·         Investment in Training

Research shows the organization profitability are positively grow with the more invest of training & development to the employees.  “US Business spend about $50 billion annually by to provide each of their employees with about 40 hours of training annually” (George W Bohlander Scott A.Snell, 2015).

Eg: In addition to above mentioned high budgeted trainings, many Sri Lankan organizations are organizing formal internal training programs time to time, use their experience employee as trainer and he or she share his\her experience with juniors and those trainings are so much effective to deal with their practical day to day works. We called this kind of sessions as brainstorming sessions.

Figure 1.0: Training Expenditure Allocation by Type of Workers

                                       (George W Bohlander Scott A.Snell, 2015)

According to George W Bohlander Scott A.Snell ( 2015), more than 50% of trainig budget is allocated for non executive employee who are directly handling the production. (George W Bohlander Scott A.Snell, 2015)

Eg: In Sri Lankan appreal organizations more than 50% of training bugdet is allocated to train machine operators and head count of machine operators are more than 60% of the total staff. Basically machine operators are directly engaging with production process and entire qulaity of the product is depend on the skills of machine operators.

 

·         Strategic Learning & Development defined

“Strategic L & D is an approach to helping to learn & development that is concerned with how the organization’s goals will be achieved through its human resources by means of integrated L&D strategies, policies & practices” (Armstrong, 2012).

Figure 2.0: Strategic Model of Training.

 

 

                                                            (Armstrong, 2012)

·         Training needs assessment

 

A training needs assessment can be defined as determining the gap between what an employee must be able to do and what he or she can or is currently doing. A training needs assessment (also called a “training needs analysis”) therefore identifies the gap between what the job expects an employee to do, on the one hand, and what the employee is doing, on the other. A training needs analysis discovers whether there is a discrepancy or conflict between what an employee ought to be doing and that which he or she can do (Amna Asrar Mirza Sumaira Riaz, 2012)

 

Eg: Sri Lankan banking sector measures service quality of customer service employees and assess the gap between expected service quality with actual service quality. Results will use to implement relevant trainings to bridge the gap between expected and actual service quality.

 

·         Training Design

The design phase involves the creation of a training and development plan with clear objectives. It is an attempt to determine systematically how to achieve a positive transfer of skills, knowledge, and attitudes from the training situation to the job situation (Elgamal, 1997)

Eg: Enhance customer service skills by conducting a special training for call center staff and this training session should be designed to enhance managing customer complaints and treating customers in very positive manner. 

 

·         Implementation
Implementation is the point where a trainer activates the training plan, or it is the process of putting a training programme into operation. approach to training was pragmatic and realistic, but not necessarily sophisticated. In training implementation HRD primarily focuses on ensuring that agents, team leaders and managers possess the appropriate attitudes and skills to deliver and provide quality service (Thomas N. Garavan et al., 2008).

Eg: On the jobs trainings for bank tellers are more important than off the job trainings. Hence, they need to learn from practical experience to deal with different situations.

 

·         Evaluation

The Kirkpatrick Model is a globally recognized method of evaluating the results of training and learning programs. It assesses both formal and informal training methods and rates them against four levels of criteria: reaction, learning, behavior, and results. Through training evaluation organization can measure ROI of training in both financial and non-financial outcomes (Antonio Giangreco et al., 2010)

Eg: After the customer service training, daily customer complaints reduced from 127 to 68. This is considerable improvement and through training programme employees were learned, changed their behavior and that will lead to reduce customer complaints. Reducing customer complaint is the result.

 

References

Amna Asrar Mirza Sumaira Riaz, 2012. Training needs assessment in Islamic banking sector. Qualitative Research in Financial Market, Volume Vol.4, pp. 142-155.

Antonio Giangreco et al,., 2010. Are we doing the right thing? Food for thought on training evaluation and its context. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Volume VOL 39, pp. 162-177.

Armstrong, M., 2012. Amstrong's Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice. Londan: Kogan Page.

Elgamal, R. M. A.-K. M. A., 1997. A macro model of training and development validation. Journal of European Industrial, pp. 87-101.

George W Bohlander Scott A.Snell, 2015. Principles of Human Resource Management. Delhi: Cengage Learning India Private Limited.

Thomas N. Garavan at all, 2008. Mapping the context and practice of training, development and HRD in European call centres. Journal of European Industrial training, Volume Vol.32, pp. 612-728.

 

 

Comments


  1. I got lots of insight on Training and development ,while I was researching on my blog post ‘ Training and Developments in contemporary orgnisations’ topic. While agreeing with facts mentioned in your article I would like to add little more into it,
    According to Jha (2016), The objective of training is to help the organization to achieve its purpose by adding value to its key resource – the people it employees. Training means investing in the people to enable them to perform better and to empower them to make the best use of their natural abilities. The particular objectives of training are to:
    • Develop the competences of employees and improve their performance;
    • Help people to grow within the organization in order that, as far as possible, its future needs for human resource can be met from within;
    • Reduce the learning time for employees starting in new jobs on appointment, transfers or promotion, and ensure that they become fully competent as quickly and economically as possible.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Great. Moreover, Internationally different companies provides training and development program to their employees for the improvement of their skills and abilities. In the start of 90s Sears Credit initiated a key rearrangement and retorted with a career-development programs. This program was developed for employee in order to line up their skills with
      changing jobs and also ensured that program was adding value for the growth of their organization. Companies also think that they were not allocating career opportunities to their employees with acquaintances and abilities to get benefit from these opportunities (O’Herron and Simonsen, 1995).

      Delete
  2. During my literature review on T & D , I found several other popular methods that are in use for evaluation, from them I find D. Phillip’s Evaluation approach another great approach in evaluating the financial contribution of Training and development. D. Phillip’s Evaluation approach is basically an extention to the Krikpatrick's by adding another level upon learning which evaluates "behavioural changes" as a result of Training and development efforts (Phillips,J.1996).

    Phillips,J. (1996) Accountability in Human Resource Management. Oxford. Butterworth- Heinemann.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Kirkpatrick (1959) to evaluate the effectiveness of continuing education
      (Praslova, 2010). As a type of outcome data evaluation, KM emphasizes the understanding of the training outcomes such as satisfaction toward the instructor, knowledge or skill gained, attitude or performance changed, and improved gains of the organization (Werner and DeSimone, 2011).

      Delete
  3. I agree to your points above Sadeep, according to Jehanzeb & Bashir (2013) “a perfect employee training and development program must be the mixture of knowledge, career development and goal setting”. As organizations try to survive in this dynamic industry, more importance must be directed towards human capital in order to remain competitive. Training and development have been invaluable in increasing the productivity of organizations, it not only enhances employee’s knowledge and skills but also provides them an opportunity to learn and increase their competency (Nda & Fard, 2013).

    Nda, M.M. and Fard, R.Y. (2013). The impact of employee training and development on employee productivity. Global journal of commerce and management perspective, 2(6), pp.91-93.

    Jehanzeb, K. and Bashir, N.A. (2013). Training and development program and its benefits to employee and organization: A conceptual study. European Journal of business and management, 5(2).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Agree with your statement. In addition, Mel Kleiman (2000) described that the essentials parts of a worthy employee training program are constructed on orientation, management skills, and operational skills of employees. These theories are the groundwork of any employee development program. Janet Kottke (1999) described that employee development programs must be comprises with core proficiencies, appropriate structure through which organizations develop their businesses at
      corporate level. The basic function of the theory is to gain knowledge, cooperation, inventive thinking and resolving problem (Kottke 1999).

      Delete
  4. “Expose people early and often to the training they will need to become successful leaders” says (Cloutier, et al., 2015).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Definitely. Trainings create very successful leaders. specially organizations are focusing on special leadership training programmes to develop skills of corporate level employees.
      Leadership training is an essential and strategic component of development plans for
      managers in organizations. Leadership training programmes help managers develop
      conceptual and emotional intelligence and equip them with tools to manage teams more
      effectively (Souders, B, 2020).

      Delete
  5. "Training and Development in Organizations" provides models for measuring the benefits of training in terms of increased output, payroll savings, and more. The contributors offer a variety of instructional techniques based on cognitive and behavioral theory, including training in self-management and training through reinforcement. They examine how retraining midcareer and older workers can enhance job performance. And they explain how effective training goes beyond formal instruction in the job to include such diverse factors as work-group settings, informal training by peers, and the socialization process of the newcomer. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016)

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Employee Motivation

Performance Management

Reward Management